CHAPTER 3: CLIMATE CRISIS DICHOTOMY
- Mark Howitt
- Dec 12, 2025
- 41 min read
Updated: Feb 1
Written by Mark Howitt
"The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything"
-Albert Einstein
In recent years, it seems that one of the most discussed concerns regarding the health of the planet is the issues relating to global warming and climate change. Many statistics exist from notable scientists and environmental organizations, and yet there are still those who doubt that global warming exists and oppose the ideas put forth by the United Nations, NASA, and members of governments from various nations. And this is for good reason. I once believed that the rhetoric surrounding these issues was genuine, however after looking at the overall picture and doing a bit of research, I ended up coming to my own conclusions in regard to this matter. If my theories are correct, then it would seem that the whole thing is a deception, following a carefully premeditated agenda by governments and globalists around the world.
There are a lot of aspects to be considered relating to this subject, and therefore rather than stating the conclusions to my theory right away, they will be summarily outlined at the end of this chapter. To properly grasp and understand the reasons why I believe the global warming agenda is part of a grand conspiracy, we must first review some key elements and information relating to the matter so that you may come to your own conclusions. Dealing with such controversial subjects with divided viewpoints and opinions, I always encourage those who follow my work to do their own research into these matters.
Now more than ever, the public is beginning to comprehend the fact that we are often not told the truth by the government and its mainstream media outlets. This is something that conspiracy theorists have been claiming all along, however unfortunately many of them were called quacks and disregarded as tinfoil hat lunatics. The current escalating battle facing independent researchers and journalists has reached a fever pitch, and we are now witnessing an increase in censorship and opposition to those who just want to know the truth. It is absolutely liberating however, to see a growth in people that are waking up to the truth after realizing they have been lied to on so many levels.
As we proceed onward into this new era of global awakening, it becomes clear that the enlightenment and evolution of our consciousness is perhaps the most important era in human history. Each day, more and more people are seeing the reality of the world for the way it really is, as the blindfold that was put on us through globalist propaganda is removed. The lies and deception put forth by governments, corporations, and mainstream media is being exposed and opposed at an ever-increasing rate, and this is largely due to the work of independent researchers, scientists, and activists who have it their goal to find the truth and show the world the way things really are.
As we witness what seems to be the intentional destruction and pollution of our planet for resource control and corporate monetary agendas, we see a continued rise of concern by environmental activists. These concerns have caused significant political pressure, resulting in fires being ignited under the asses of policy makers and governments around the world to actually do something about the problems they have created. Despite these efforts, we see a continuation of the problems, and an increase in corporate control over the processes of bringing about the changes that are needed to create working solutions to these important issues.
Often we see that when global environmental concerns are identified, they are then broken down into fragments which causes division and dispute between those who are genuinely concerned about the issues. This process allows the problems to persist, causing deliberate confusion which leads to debates which stall the solution process. Results of research and statistics are then disputed and we see organizations put in place that become the authority of the issue. More times than not, these authorities are headed by globalists who are put in place to protect their agendas and political interests relating to the matter.
This divide and conquer technique has been used for centuries and is evidenced through countless historic examples. This concept is certainly apparent in relation to the global warming agenda. What was originally a single issue has been fragmented into subcategories, with new terminology being used to describe what was once considered to be the same thing. An example of this division can be found in the use of terms like climate change, global warming, and global dimming. Many people believe these to be the same issue and although they are related, the confusion is a result of the intentional fragmentation of the root and core of the problem. Therefore, it is important to understand each of these terms and know the differences between them in order to see the bigger picture.
CLIMATE CHANGE
Essentially, what we refer to as climate change is the periodic changes observed relating to global temperatures and patterns in weather. These shifts have occurred naturally throughout the history of the planet, and through modern advances in our research methods and technology we have been able to study and document the timeline of climate change with increasing accuracy. These advances, such as carbon dating, have given us the ability to go back in time to try and better understand the geological changes that have taken place throughout the history of the earth.
As we continue to build and refine on the historic timeline of our planet, some remarkable discoveries have been made. Some of these revelations have not only challenged what we originally believed to be true about the planet, it has also given us some clues and insight into what the future might have in store for us. As normal of a process as climate change is, it seems to have been vilified in recent years as various organizations have turned the molehill into a mountain. I remember bundling up in snowpants and walking to school in blizzards, but nowadays it seems that even if it snows the slightest, schools and busses get shut down and the number of annual “snow days” has escalated. Could it be that natural weather behaviors are being used as an opportunistic way to raise concerns as an aid to support a political agenda?
Whether we like it or not, the weather will always change as evidenced through the historic record. Though it is not common for it to snow in some parts of the world such as Africa or Egypt, it has happened in the past and is likely to occur again at some point in time. In fact, the earth has survived several ice ages and will likely witness similar periods of global freezing again at some point in the future. On the other hand, there have also been long-term periods where global temperatures have risen, indicating that these shifts in climate change occur naturally and are to be expected. According to NASA, in the past 800,000 years the earth has experienced eight cycles of transitioning from ice ages into warming periods.
Throughout the history of the earth, these periodic events of climatic change have taken place due to various reasons with the most notable being attributed to extreme weather, natural disasters, volcanic eruptions, and solar activities. It is believed that in the distant past, plumes of ash emitted by large volcanic eruptions blocked out the sun which led to the onset of ice ages. It is also believed that solar flares and cosmic events led to the melting of the ice caps which caused a rise in sea levels, resulting in a series of cataclysmic floods and increased periods of natural disasters. Details relating to these events continue to be studied intently by scientists and researchers around the world in an attempt to piece together an accurate picture of the earth's distant past.
In essence, climate change is the umbrella term we use which includes all of the related effects that are associated with it. These effects include factors such as global warming, the melting of the ice caps and glacier melts, rising sea levels, extreme weather conditions and natural disasters, as well as all of the pollution related issues like carbon emissions and the greenhouse effect. All of these related topics contribute in some way to the changes we see in global temperatures and climate conditions.
While the reasoning behind the long-term global climate change events in the past have varied, what is important to note is that if we exclude the past two centuries, all of them took place without the influence of human activities. This would indicate that the recent increase and dramatic changes in global temperatures we are currently witnessing is in direct relation to the evolution of industrialized human civilization which occurred parallel during this time period. As a result, we are seeing the un-natural acceleration of world temperatures, as well as an increased concern to combat global warming on the political stage.
GLOBAL WARMING
It's no secret that the most recent increase in the earth's average temperatures has been heavily influenced by human activities such as deforestation, industrial pollution and vehicular emissions. These measurements have continued to increase due to emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, chlorofluorocarbons, methane and other pollutants released into the atmosphere. As long as industrialized society's function using these harmful systems, the burning of fossil fuels will remain the principal source of these gases and temperatures will continue to rise.
The numerous effects of global warming have noticeably increased in just a few short decades, and this is in part due to the chain reactions that result from the influences each has on one another. These processes are usually referred to as feedback. It is similar to a domino effect, whereas one problem grows, new symptoms take place and escalate until they are all working in a cyclical symbiosis. Heat waves contribute to an increase of surface temperatures which lead to the expansion of deserts and droughts. It also causes an increase in water vapor and thawing of permafrost, and the retreat of glaciers and the melting of the ice caps. This then results in a rising of sea levels, causing flooding to coastal infrastructures and a disruption to crop yields and agriculture. This then contributing to food shortages and famines in the affected areas. Increases in CO2 levels create greenhouse gases that form air pollution which causes ocean acidification and extreme changes in natural weather behaviors.
These feedback cycles can be found within nearly every aspect associated with global warming, which has an impact on all living organisms on the planet as well as the ecosystems they belong to. The timing and duration of seasons, along with the events associated with seasonal change have shifted, causing the behaviors of flora and fauna to change in natural defense. An example of this can be seen with the early or late blooming of plants during the spring, or a change in the timing and aspects of mating and migration behaviors of many animal and insect species.
Despite these instinctual reactions however, many species simply cannot survive the worsening conditions they are faced with. As stated by an IPCC document by Steffen and Waters in 2016, “the abundant empirical evidence of the unprecedented rate and global scale of impact of human influence on the Earth system has led many scientists to call for an acknowledgement that the Earth has entered a new geological epoch: the Anthropocene”.
Statistics show that the average global temperature has risen by around 2°F, or 1.1°C since the later decades of the 1800's. This initial spiked increase seems to be directly linked to the beginning of industrialized society and technological advancements. Prior to the automobile, people would ride horses or camels as a means of transportation, and prior to the domestication of horses they would walk. Societies spread and became established largely due to these advancements in transportation as there were less civilizations around the world when humans walked upon the earth. In our modern age, the term “horsepower” is no longer associated with the stamina and speed of a steed.
Since the dawn of the industrial age, the global temperature has increased on an average of 0.11°F, or 0.06°C per decade since 1850. More recent records however indicate that this rate has more than tripled since 1982, with an average rise of 0.36°F, or 0.20°C per decade. As a result of this significant increase, over the last decade we have seen the warmest years documented on record and it is expected that we will continue to see this pattern in the future years to come.
Analysis and future projections of these statistics seem to indicate that temperatures will only continue to rise unless something drastic and immediate on an international scale is done. Studies done by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) came to the conclusion that “human influence on climate has been the dominant cause of observed warming since the mid-20th century”. Authorities have acknowledged the problem for years, as a 2013 “Summary for Policymakers” documented stated that “warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950's, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, sea level has risen, and the concentrations of greenhouse gases have increased”.
GLOBAL DIMMING
Another symptom in relation to global warming that should be discussed here is known as “global dimming”, which is mainly attributed to human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels and emissions of aerosols and air pollutants.
Global dimming occurs when the amount of sunlight that reaches the surface of the earth is gradually decreased due to being blocked or reflected by tiny particles in the atmosphere, such as aerosols, soot, and sulfates. As these particles are dispersed they absorb or capture solar radiation, which prevents it from reaching the earth's surface. When these pollutants are captured by water droplets, clouds become smaller and cause the light from the sun to be reflected.
Ironically, the process of global dimming acts almost as an atmospheric shield as it reduces the amount of solar radiation the earth receives. As a result of this, it can temporarily offset global warming by causing a drop in temperatures and gradual cooling effect. One's initial reaction to this might be that global dimming could be a possible solution for the global warming issue; however, the overall impact it has on regional weather patterns and the environment itself causes more harm than good for the most part.
The distance, positioning and spherical shape of the planet as it orbits the sun has a direct influence on the various temperature levels and weather patterns that occur naturally around the world, making some regions warmer than other areas which are shaded or not seen by the sun. Countries near the equator are more exposed to the sun and therefore have more tropical environments or arid landscapes. Global dimming can cause a change to these natural systems however, resulting in reduced amounts of precipitation, droughts, and other negative effects.
The phenomenon of global dimming was most noted between the 1950's and 1990's but has seen a reduction following this period due to the many global efforts and regulations put in place due to environmental concerns and active attempts to bring down pollution levels. As a result of this, there has been a reversal in some areas such as the northern hemisphere, however some regions continue to experience global dimming indicating the occurrence can shift and fluctuate depending on several factors. In some places, air quality regulations and the decrease in pollution have resulted in another phenomenon known as “global brightening”, which is an observed increase in the amount of solar radiation that reaches the earth.
What remains clear is that despite our awareness and attempts to solve these issues, we are only beginning to understand the implications of these subjects as we monitor the situation and document the statistics of annual patterns. We are learning more every day and the long-term effects of the changes we have made may not come to realization until many years down the road. Nature, and the universal systems that form everything we experience exists in a very fragile harmony. Often when an element of this harmony is disrupted, we see a negative outcome as nature tries to repair itself and find order within the chaos, but it will always eventually find balance in the end.
SOLVING THE PROBLEM
If you hadn't noticed, a commonly used word that can be seen in many of the reports acknowledging that there is a climate problem is “observed”. The use of this word implies that they are aware of the problem and at least some of their attention and efforts are pointed in that direction. Some of the more important questions we must then be asking is, if they are aware and there is so much concern for global warming, then why hasn't something been done about it after all these years? Why do we continue to allow these corporations and industries operate the way that they do, being a direct contributor to the problem? If there is such an effort by various organizations and charities around the world to stop global warming, then why is it still happening and continuing to escalate?
Past evidence shows that if the proper steps are taken to responsibly tackle the issues at hand, it does make a difference in harm reduction. If those efforts were to be implemented at a faster rate, and with more enthusiasm and collectivity, then surely, we should be able to at least have a fighting chance against the looming monster we inevitably created.
The first United Nations treaty with universal ratification was the 1987 Montreal Protocol, which successfully reduced the amount of ODS, or ozone depleting substances by 99%. The objective of this protocol was to gradually phase out the production and consumption of products that produce chemicals that contributed to the depletion of the ozone layer, such as aerosols, fire extinguishers and refrigerants that used chemicals like CFC's, halons and HCFS's. After changes to industry standards and new technologies were established following the Kigali Amendment, this allowed for the gradual repair of the ozone layer. These efforts saw a huge success rate because the Montreal Protocol was the only UN treaty that had universal cooperation and ratification.
It's only common sense that anywhere we have actually reduced the amount we travel using fossil fuels as a source of energy, and transitioned the manufacturing methods of heavy industries, we have seen a decrease in the amount of carbon emissions and air pollution. After changes were made by the U.S. to the Clean Air Act in 1990, immediate changes were noticed and by 1995 emissions were 40 percent lower than the annual target. The following year, there was a 10 to 25% decrease in rainfall acidity. The intended goal of the act was to cut emissions of sulphur dioxide by 9.1 million tons by the year 2000 by placing limits on coal-burning plants, considered a major contributor to the problem.
In a report published in June 2017 by the World Economic Forum, the countries that are responsible for air pollution, which consists of nearly all of them, are aware there is a dire need to cut back their emissions and yet carbon dioxide emissions still rise continually. The report listed the top 5 countries responsible for the highest levels of pollution, and not surprisingly they are the most populated areas and power centers of the Earth. The overall percentages included China (30%), the United States (15%), Europe (9%), India (7%), Russia (5%) and Japan (4%), totaling 70% of global emissions.
According to a March 2017 report published by the International Energy Agency (IEA) titled "Perspectives for the Energy Transition - Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System", emissions need to drop by 70% by the year 2050. Some serious changes and adjustments are needed to be made regarding the way we live out our daily lives. These changes need also to apply to the methods we produce goods and operate on all levels of business and industry on a global level.
Essentially, we need to update our current industry standards so that we are not operating using outdated and archaic technologies that in turn damage our planet. According to the report, "limiting the rise in global mean temperature to well below 2°C would require an energy transition of exceptional scope, depth and speed...Such a deep transformation of the energy sector would require ambitious policy measures, including a rapid phase out of fossil-fuel subsidies, rising CO2 prices, extensive electricity market reforms to integrate large shares of renewables, and stringent low-carbon and energy efficiency mandates."
The report also lists some suggestions on how we can achieve this goal, and yet little has changed since the time of the reports release. Some of these suggestions were to transition 95% of our electricity to a low-carbon renewable energy system, and that "7 out of every 10 new cars would need to be electric, compared with 1 in 100 today." Realistically, it would make much more sense to transition all vehicles to operate on some form of renewable energy. The report also suggested that CO2 emissions from the industrial sector would need to drop a drastic 80% lower than what is currently being emitted today, and that "the entire existing building stock would need to be retrofitted."
And how much did they suggest this would cost to implement? The report states that in order to make these changes, "$3.5 trillion in energy-sector investments would be needed on average each year until 2050, which is around twice current levels of investment." Do you think they got their funding? If they did, we sure aren't seeing a 70% increase in clean fuel cars or renewable energy technologies being implemented.
Often, organizations will request money from the government budget knowing that they can't get funding if they fix the problems and therefore drag things on as long as they can. After all, the year 2050 is three decades away from now, and $105 trillion isn't that much money. At least they'll get a chunk of that government budget pie and that's what counts right? A 2008, the IEA did an analysis called the Energy Technology Perspectives (ETP) and "projected" that energy sector CO2 emissions will increase by 130% by the year 2050, and that this will happen "in the absence of new policies or supply constraints, largely as a result of increased fossil fuel usage”.
Initiatives such as the Kyoto Protocol which became effective as of February 16th, 2005, and is an extension of the 1992 'United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change' (UNFCCC) have attempted to curve the statistics by reducing countries overall greenhouse gas (GHG) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions annually. There have been some documented changes in regard to some the levels of emissions in some countries within the last few years, as many of these countries have strived to work together under the umbrella of the United Nations in an attempt to fix the problem.
Another notable cause that was established to help fight environmental issues is known as the 30 Under 30, which is a list of innovators awarded for their efforts in tackling the climate change and global warming issue, among other environmental initiatives. A Canadian organization associated with this cause is called the Corporate Knights, who publish annual lists that recognize Canadian entrepreneurs, activists, and engineers who have worked on solutions and contributed to achieving sustainability. These millennials and Gen Z figures are awarded for their involvement in everything from economical aspects, resource and waste management, regenerative agriculture, and sustainable energy solutions. Efforts relating to environmental activism and changes to policies and practices are also acknowledged through the organization intended to inspire the youth and future generations.
POLITICAL AGENDAS
In a similar initiative to that of the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris Agreement was launched in December of 2015 as a means to mitigate climate change. This agreement was part of the United Nations UNFCCC that was initially signed by all 195 countries that were present at the United Nations Climate Change conference. Then U.S. President Barack Obama signed America on board initially, as the U.S. and China were listed as being responsible for nearly half of the emissions on the planet, totaling 45% combined.
Then, in April of 2017, according to an article by the Daily Express titled "Members Of MEP Pen 'Love Letter' to President Trump Urging Him To Scrap Climate Change Policy", a group of politicians urged Donald Trump to remove the United States from the Paris Agreement by sending him a letter which included 20 members from the UK Independence Party, members from the European Parliament stemming from the right-wing Alternative for Germany, among other parties.
The following month, another letter was sent to Trump with recommendations to pull the U.S. from the Paris Agreement which was sent to him by Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. This letter, sent on May 25th, 2017, was signed by 22 politicians that were elected in states whose industries were reliant on the burning of fossil fuels such as oil, gas and coal. The chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, Senator John Barrasso, drafted the letter along with climate change denialist Senator Jim Inhofe. It may come as no surprise to hear that the 22 senators who signed the letter with the urge to withdrawal received over $10 million from leading fossil-fuel reliant companies as campaign contributions spanning their previous three election cycles.
During the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, and to no surprise to some, Trump made an official pledge to withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. This announcement was made on June 1st 2017, when he stated that the Paris accord would "undermine (the U.S.) economy," and claimed that the treaty "puts (the U.S.) at a permanent disadvantage." He believed it would undermine his "America First" policy and it would not help American businesses and workforce. In reaction to the announcement, several petitions were started from all over the United States including a "ParisMyState" and "MoveOn" petition which received over 535,000 signatures.
Despite this outcry consisting of well over half a million people in America alone, a formal withdrawal notice was submitted on November 4th, 2019. A majority of the countries on board with the Paris Agreement condemned this decision publicly, and Stephen Hawking scorned Trump saying that his decision will "cause avoidable environmental damage to our beautiful planet, endangering the natural world, for us and our children." David Suzuki, the Canadian environmental activist reacted by stating that "Trump just passed on the best deal the planet has ever seen", while another known environment activist and scientist, Dana Nuccitelli, commented on the situation by saying "now seems inevitable that the history books will view Trump as America's worst-ever president".
Due to the initial contractual agreement that was signed by President Obama, the U.S. withdrawal could not take effect until after November 4th 2020, one year after submitting the official documentation of the withdrawal. Perhaps to no surprise, the date of the withdrawal happened to land conveniently the day after the 2020 presidential election. Politically, it is common practice for electoral candidates to schedule these events after elections in order to follow a pre-planned political agenda. As history has proven time and time again, promises made by these officials during their campaign trails end up being broken or radically transformed by the time they take office.
One thing is for certain though, and that is the fact that Trump seems to have an agenda in regard to his war against clean energy and environmental activism. He has often stated that it's all a scam and his detachment from the global communities efforts to combat climate concerns clearly indicates his desire to continue in the destructive ways of the old in order for the energy industries to continue profiting as much as possible, no matter what environmental consequences are to be had as a result. An example of this can be seen in the public feud against Elon Musk and his opposition towards the expansion of Tesla vehicles and other forms of free energy technology.
While a majority of the world are actively striving for ways to reduce the carbon footprint on the planet, he has continued to endorse and support fossil fuel industries making it clear that he has no concern over the health of the planet. He openly mocks the efforts by countries that are transitioning to producing cleaner energy and has used his political powers to slow down this transition. His excessive use of the phrase “drill baby drill” comes to mind in regard to this matter, and his interest to control the natural resources of other countries suggests this is being done for calculated political reasons.
CARBON TAX SCANDAL
Environmental activism has been around for a long time, witnessing decades of countless efforts and attempts to try and put a stop to the human activities that are directly causing the destruction and continual decline of the planet. Despite these numerous efforts, many of the problems still persist as new threats are identified and are added to a growing list of environmental concerns. It really feels like we are taking one step forward and three steps back when it comes to these issues. Inevitably, this has led people to wonder why we are not seeing positive results and actual changes in regard to these important global concerns.
The unfortunate truth of the matter is that it is simply not profitable to solve these issues. It is not within the interests of the globalist agenda to put themselves out of business by fixing these problems, for many of these organizations would have no reason to exist if solutions were to be put in place. Not only would the industries associated with the production of fossil fuels and resource control become obsolete, but also the many NGO's and international organizations that were formed as the opposition would also lose their funding. Essentially, this scheme operates in a way so that the puppeteers can control both sides of the table.
In this way, the issue of climate change and global warming is a perfectly functioning dichotomy. This great divide has resulted in the creation of villains on both sides of the fence, with those who oppose the industries and the industries themselves being deemed the problem, when it is really the ones behind the curtain and the agenda itself being the root cause of the issue. This counterproductive cycle has allowed for the problems to persist without any real changes to be put into place.
A prime example of this can be found within the carbon tax scandal, where people and companies are actually taxed for producing harmful emissions. In some instances, the public are taxed for vehicular emissions and companies are charged for their industrial emissions. Once again, it is a profitable endeavor and avoids providing a real solution to the problem. In many instances, some companies avoid these taxes altogether, but even if these taxes are applied, it is much cheaper for them to pay the fines and taxes then it is to stop production. In any possible scenario, money is still being passed around and, in many cases, has led to the creation of new revenue streams.
Carbon taxes were created in an attempt to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions by both the industrial and public sectors, by increasing the cost of the production and consumption of fossil fuels. In theory, this decreases the demand for the goods and services that produce these emissions resulting in a lowering of the rate of pollutants. Yet again we can see that an increase in the cost of these goods and services actually increases the amount of revenue made by production companies, even if a tax is applied. In some countries, companies are even rewarded with a carbon tax rebate.
While the goal of carbon taxes is to bring up the price of fossil fuels production and consumption, we are actually seeing an increase in production rates and the establishment of new pipelines and extraction operations. As the urgency to “drill baby drill” is put out to the masses, I recall Trump recently reporting with pride that the prices at the pump continue to be offered at an affordable and stable rate, being lower than many countries in comparison. The promotion of low gas prices seems to encourage consumers to continue to fill up their tanks, leading to an increase in emission rates, rather than discouraging the burning of fossil fuels.
These carbon tax schemes that have been established avoid any real solutions to fixing the crisis, allowing for it to continue despite their obvious acknowledgement of it. Instead of transitioning to clean energy systems on an international level, taxes have been applied in an attempt to slow down the emission rates which allows for the continuation of profits and destruction of the environment. As one report indicates, “at the current greenhouse gas (GHG) emission rate, the carbon budget for staying below 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) would be exhausted by 2028”.
As long as there are budgets, taxes, rebates and profits to be made, we will continue to see a rise in greenhouse gas emissions. The efforts of environmental activists will fall short of their goals until the true source of the problem is identified and the issue is seen from an outside view for what it really is. It will not be until industries and societies around the world are forced to transition to clean energy solutions, and stricter laws and punishments are implemented that we will actually be on the right path to solving the climate change crisis.
GEOENGINEERING
One of the most important factors regarding the subject of climate change is the various aspects and relation it has to the patterns and behavior of weather. The importance and impact that the diversity of weather systems has on the planet cannot be understated, as it is a fundamental necessity required for all living things to survive. Weather is an important element which effects nearly all systems on earth and contributes greatly to the healthy stability of the various lifecycles in existence. Without it, many life forms could not exist and even the slightest changes to the natural order of things can cause serious long-term side effects.
A majority of people around the world depend on weather forecasts to be able to prepare and be aware of upcoming short and long-term weather conditions in their region. The Old Farmer's Almanac recently announced it would cease its publications due to the “chaotic media environment”, however it was used for over 208 years to predict the weather and help farmers and naturalists know what to expect on an annual basis. This almanac was very likely the first form of a weather network we had before there was radio broadcasting, television, and internet technology to share the information.
Observations and predictions of weather have been done so in a natural way for a very long time, and the chaotic media environment the Farmer's Almanac speaks of seems curious. Could it be that it was becoming harder to predict the weather with accuracy due to increasing rates of abnormal weather behavior? After learning about the announcement of the ending of the Farmer's Almanac, I began to wonder if there was more to this decision than meets the eye, and if the climate change agenda could in some way be related.
Our ability to manipulate and control the weather is no secret and is something that we have been doing for centuries. Ancient cultures would give offerings or sacrifices to their gods in hopes that it would bring rain to increase agricultural production and prevent droughts. Gods and deities were often associated with the weather and the natural elements that was an important part of their world and for their survival. The link between nature and the spirit world still exists in many cultures around the world, even to this day.
Climate engineering, or geoengineering, is one of the ways in which we have attempted to counteract the effects of climate change and is a controversial subject in regard to this matter. Various techniques have been used to modify climate conditions such as carbon dioxide removal and radiation management. However, there have been many other methods suggested to address the problem.
In 2014, a study was done to investigate various methods of climate engineering and concluded that many of them are ineffective or “have potentially severe side effects and cannot be stopped without causing rapid climate change”. The example comes to mind that If someone throws a rock into a pond, it has a ripple effect which causes changes to the entire body of water, and it would only make sense that the same would apply when it comes to geoengineering. With every action there is a reaction, and it could be that we are skating on thin ice as we continue to experiment with weather manipulation.
As the methods for this type of modification has evolved, we have witnessed this technology being used more and more for destructive purposes, such as its implementation for military use. During the Vietnam war, between the years of 1967-1972, the U.S. Air Force were involved in a top-secret program called “Operation Popeye”. This involved the use of planes to “seed” clouds by dispersing silver iodide in the skies above Vietnam, a technique which is known as cloud seeding. This was done to extend the monsoon season by increasing the rainfall in specific areas, causing floods to bridges and transportation routes in order to disrupt supply routes and cause instability to ground troops by flooding bunker systems. The effects of cloudseeding also caused a disruption to regional agriculture and the local food supply.
After Operation Popeye was exposed by a journalist, the UN put a ban on weaponizing weather for military operations however many of these programs are top secret without ever having the intention of being declassified. During wartime, many tactical operations are conducted in secrecy and therefore we may never know that they ever took place. It only makes sense for a military to keep their plans classified in order to have the upper hand, and the weaponization of weather is extremely effective due to its cloak of invisibility leaving the targets unaware. Essentially, unless there is concrete evidence they can just blame it on the weather.
Another concerning element of invisible warfare related to weather manipulation are frequency technologies, such as the use of ionospheric research instruments known as IRI's. Many of these devices are developed and used for “research” purposes, however I believe it will only be a matter of time before the truth comes out that they have been used for military purposes. IRI's are an array of antennas that are used to temporarily energize the ionosphere by sending powerful radio waves to heat it up. It is said that these devices are used to study the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, but the potential does exist for them to be used for more nefarious reasons, such as the ability to cause earthquakes and cause weather anomalies.
The most well-known example of this is HAARP, or the High-frequency Active Aural Research Program, which is located in Gakona, Alaska. Many people believe that this facility is the only one of its kind, however Russia is also involved in the use of this technology through their Sura Ionospheric Heating Facility and the more recently launched Ionosphera-M Satellite Constellation. In 2025, during the war between Russia and Ukraine, a series of large earthquakes occurred in the Kamchatka Peninsula off the east coast of Russia. The megathrust quake that happened on July 30th was the sixth largest earthquake to ever be recorded by seismometers. While it is hard to prove, many people believe the high amount and size of these earthquakes could have been caused deliberately through the use of IRI's or similar devices.
Although it is claimed that these facilities were created for the scientific study of the ionosphere, the HAARP program was originally established and operated by the U.S. Military before they “handed it over” to the University of Fairbanks. This was likely done to publicly disassociate the program from the military due to the controversy surrounding its potential to be used as a weather manipulating weapon. Dr. Nick Begich, an Alaskan congressman, researcher and author, published an informative and detailed book called “Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology” which addresses many of these concerns.
When mankind plays God with the elements of nature, it often has serious repercussions which may not be immediately visible but eventually becomes apparent. Essentially, what we do now will echo through eternity. Although some of the attempts to reverse or control the effects of climate change have been done with good intentions, they have actually caused more harm and damage to our planet. As these experiments continue without knowing what the outcome will be, the real solutions to the problem are being avoided in order to maintain control over the earth's natural resources, and to make as much money as possible.
SOLUTION SUPPRESSION
In the span of just a few decades, we have witnessed a significant increase in the advancements of innovation and technology. Brilliant inventions are introduced to the world on a daily basis, altering the we live our lives and advancing our human capabilities. New discoveries change the way we view the world, and how we once viewed historic events. The rate of this evolution occurs faster than ever before, and it seems that by now we should have at least been able to solve the climate crisis issue, along with the many other environmental concerns that threaten our survival on this planet.
Clean and sustainable energy sources is perhaps the most obvious way to overcome the problem of climate change and global warming. Over the last century there have been many individuals who have discovered or created ways in which would greatly decrease the carbon footprint we leave behind on the planet. If these solutions were to be implemented, then it would put an end to these dilemmas, or at least reduce the symptoms of them significantly. Instead, what we are left with is the sad realization that the solutions and answers to our problems are purposefully being suppressed by those in control.
Historically, the most infamous account of this happening occurred in March of 1901, when Nikola Tesla was given an investment of $150,000 by J.P. Morgan in exchange for a 51% share of any patents relating to Tesla's development of global wireless communication and his Wardenclyffe Tower project. The reason that wireless technology was not available to the public for almost an entire century after its discovery is because after had Morgan asked, “where do we put the meter?”, Tesla responded by telling him he wanted to make the energy technology available to the public for free. As a result of the resulting dispute, Morgan pulled his funding for the project which stalled its development. The subsequent lack of support resulted in financial ruin for Tesla, and he ended up dying virtually penniless.
Considered one of the greatest inventors of all time, Tesla was responsible for the development of several free energy devices and pioneering innovations. Many of his inventions were never developed or made available to the public until many decades later however, if they were ever released at all. One can only imagine how different the world would be if these technologies were made available over a century ago, at the time of their initial development. If it were not for the corporate interests of a few greedy individuals, the world would be a much cleaner place to live not only for us, but for future generations.
Tesla was convinced that the resonance of the earth could be used as a global conductor of energy and existed within the invisible space that surrounds us. He referred to this energy source as the aether, and the term from “out of the aether” can be attributed to this very notion. He was able to prove this by creating devices that could transmit electrical power wirelessly through the earth, and his efforts greatly influenced the work of many inventors that followed in his footsteps. It is no coincidence that the vast majority of those influenced by Tesla's revelations were also met with opposition and resistance by those in power and control in a continued effort to suppress the advancements of this type of technology.
As a way to circumvent any new inventions and discoveries that were being developed in this field, several techniques were employed in an attempt to suppress and stall the progression of free energy development. Researchers involved in these studies were deemed as fringe scientists or quacks, and there was a lack of funding for these projects. The powers that be began to sequester any new patents that were submitted, and only provided funding for these projects if they agreed for them to be shelved away from public access. This type of technology posed a threat to the establishment and corporate interests, so the United States passed the “Invention Secrecy Act” in 1951. Any patents for these new inventions were deemed classified in order to keep them secret, and they believed it should only be available and used for military purposes.
Curiously, in the same year that the Invention Secrecy Act was passed, Willis Lamb discovered what is known in physics as the Lamb Shift. He revealed that an anomaly existed in the energy between two electron orbitals found in hydrogen atoms caused by the effects of quantum electrodynamics. After Lamb began experimenting in 1947, he was able to prove that energy does exist within empty space as constantly fluctuating virtual particles. These shifts are quantum vacuum fluctuations and provided crucial evidence for the existence of zero-point energy (ZPE). As a result of his discoveries, Lamb was awarded the Nobel Prize for physics in 1955, but the technology was suppressed and never implemented.
Another suppressed inventor of alternative energy was the Austrian psychiatrist and psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich, who was a student of Sigmund Freud that fled Europe to the United States before the outbreak of the second World War. Reich is credited with the discovery of orgone energy, which he believed to be a form of esoteric energy and universal life force. He created cosmic orgone engineering devices such as the ORAC, or Orgone Accumulator box and the “Cloudbuster” device, which could capture and amplify orgone energy. The cloudbuster is similar to an antenna, made with long hollow metal or copper pipes as well as resins and powerful crystals like quartz, grounded in water and used to direct the energy similar to the concept of a magic wand. He created the device to manipulate and direct atmospheric orgone in order to change the weather and produce rain clouds.
After learning about his experiments and ability to manipulate the weather, the FDA launched an investigation against Reich in 1954. They obtained an injunction to stop the development and distribution of his inventions, and after defying the injunction he was arrested and convicted of criminal contempt. He was raided by the FBI and they seized all of his devices and research documents, burning his books and destroying everything he had been working on. Reich died while in prison just a few years later, in 1957. It is possible that some of this technology was later used by the U.S. Military in Vietnam by cloudseeding during Operation Popeye.
Evidence seems to show that many of the alphabet agencies that exist have been actively involved in the suppression of technology in order to keep it away from being accessed by the general public. Not only has the FDA, CIA, and FBI had a hand in this, but also the Environmental Protection Agency. Lt. Col. Charles Brown, nicknamed Charlie Brown, was a well-respected military official and inventor that battled with the EPA throughout much of his later years. He is credited for a number of inventions, many of which were never patented due to a clear attempt to suppress them.
Most notably, his inventions related to automobiles that cut down car emissions by 50-70%. He described this intake system as being like a “thunderstorm in a bottle”, and instead of having this innovative technology approved, his lab was robbed several times, he was constantly harassed, and him and his family survived many bomb threats. Unfortunately, he passed away in 2008, and his patents were not filed or approved until a decade afterwards. Many of these were passed between the years of 2022-2025 but have yet to be implemented or mass produced, likely shelved like many other inventions in this aspect.
An earlier threat to the establishment came about in 1936, when Canadian mechanic and inventor Charles Pogue passed his 3rd patent for the creation of his Pogue Carburetor. He proved that his carburetor was highly fuel efficient when he was able to travel over 200 miles on just a gallon of gasoline. Pogue's discovery was initially praised by the media, gaining interest from the international community, which caused people to pull stocks and influenced a Toronto stock market crash. After these events, Pogue was the victim of several burglaries and was ridiculed and harassed by officials who claimed he was a fringe scientist.
There is an abundance of examples that exist in where someone will come up with an invention that would positively change the way we live our lives, only to have them censored, bought out, ridiculed, or banned outright. In most of these cases, it was done to avoid the public from having access to it so that the giant corporations would not go out of business, and to avoid the threat of their products and services becoming obsolete. This is the reason why alternative energy vehicles and free energy devices have not become a staple of our society. Therefore, it remains clear that as long as there is a profit motive we will never be able to put an end to these important issues.
INVENTOR ASSASSINATIONS
What demands even more attention is the fact that a high percentage of scientists and inventors who were involved in the development and research in the area of free energy died under mysterious circumstances, and the details surrounding their deaths share many common elements and similarities. This evidence can only lead to one conclusion. These inventors and scientists were all deliberately murdered as part of a coordinated effort and campaign to silence them in order to cease any further developments of their studies and inventions.
It is to my belief that these assassinations were carried out by a top-secret faction of the shadow government that could still exist and function even to this day. This covert operation has remained classified in order to ensure its continuation, and to avoid exposing the source, the agents, and the elements of the program. The clandestine nature of the operation makes it difficult to prove its existence, which in turn protects the agenda and its operatives from being exposed. Despite this secrecy however, the facts and evidence relating to these murders speak for themselves, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that it's simply impossible for the similarities and staggering amount of these inventor deaths to all have taken place out of sheer coincidence.
The work of these inventors is discredited by the mainstream scientific community even to this day, often being described as pseudoscience or not verifiable. Despite their credentials, the work of these individuals has been disputed or opposed, which only adds weight to the fact that these devices do work, and the inventors were deliberately killed in order to silence and halt development of their projects. Patents, if approved at all, were often bought only to be classified and shelved away under the secrecy act. Time and time again, we see this happening and if you add in the element of murder, it only begs to question why this was happening. As the old saying goes, where there is smoke, there is fire.
It appears that inventors who were involved in the research and development of alternative energy technologies for automobiles were specifically targeted by this campaign. In nearly all of these instances, these people were followed, harassed, had their labs broken into and research destroyed, and eventually ended up dying under curious circumstances. Those who have questioned these events believing that their deaths were part of a planned-out conspiracy have been deemed paranoid and delusional, but in the end the evidence speaks for itself.
Prior to the late 1970's, it seems that these inventors were simply oppressed and blackballed by using techniques like patent sequestering, harassment and burglary to send the message. What seems to be evident is that over time, specifically as we approached the 1980's, these tactics amplified and efforts to silence and disrupt the work of these innovators became more lethal as it amplified. This change in the pattern of these events adds support and evidence to my theory there was likely some sort of operation put in place to begin murdering anyone they could not silence or buy out.
After Tom Ogle made the accidental discovery that he could make an engine run on its own fumes, he was offered 25 million dollars for his patent by the giant gas company Shell. Despite the large sum of money on the table, he declined the offer from Shell after learning that they intended to shelve and classify the patent. He wanted his invention to be available to the public and would have rather accepted a smaller deal in order to help the world out, but his work was a clear threat to the fossil fuel industry.
On April 14th, 1978, Ogle was shot outside of a bar by a random stranger, but he ended up miraculously surviving the assassination attempt. A few months later, on August 18th, Ogle was found dead due to an accidental overdose of pain killers and alcohol. Those close to Ogle, including some of his own family members, claim that he had no prior history of drug use and believe that he was deliberately murdered after the previous failed attempt on his life.
In the 1980's, Floyd “Sparky” Sweet invented the Vacuum Triode Amplifier (VTA), which tapped into zero-point energy by extracting excess energy from vacuum fluctuations using magnets and coils. He laid out the details for his concepts and research on free energy in a paper titled “Nothing is Something”, however due to a clear opposition to his work was never peer reviewed or validated, leading to debates and controversy surrounding his VTA technology. Throughout his career, he was constantly stalked and threatened to stop his research but he continued in his work. He then had his laboratory broken into and his notes and materials stolen, and eventually Sparky was killed under very mysterious circumstances. After his murder, the FBI arrived at his residence in vans and seized all of his materials.
Although electrolysis was first discovered in 1789, Stanley Meyer invented a water fuel cell engine in the 90's that was powered by H2O, using resonance to split the water into hydrogen and oxygen. He gained a lot of attention after he was able to drive his water powered vehicle from one coast of the United States to the other on just 22 gallons of water. According to Leonard Holihan from the Advanced Energy Research Institute, Meyer's creation was “one of the most important inventions of the century”. Meyer had many inventions but after they were suppressed, he became wise to the fact that people involved in this type of work had an uphill battle to get their patents approved, and even if they were they would be suppressed and classified.
In 1998, while Meyer's was at a restaurant meeting with some “potential investors”, he suddenly became extremely ill and ran outside into the parking lot violently vomiting. According to his brother, who was with him at the time, the last words he spoke before he died were “they poisoned me”. According to the official death certificate, he was at a meeting with members of NATO, and his cause of death was listed as a brain aneurysm. Water fueled vehicle technology remained on the backburner until more recent years, when Elon Musk became the face of this technology despite the fact that Stanley Meyer deserves all the credit and recognition.
Many other incidents follow a similar series of patterns, such as Edwin Gray, inventor of the patent for the Pulsed Capacitor Discharge Electric Engine. After his lab was raided and burglarized, he was found dead under mysterious conditions in his home in 1989. Atomic scientist Howard Johnson, who had a prestigious military background and invented the magnetron motor had his patents denied, and his equipment was stolen after his shop was broken into. Him and his family dealt with multiple assassination attempts against them.
After receiving funding for anti-gravity research for G-Engine development, scientist Dr. Ning Li went missing for over a decade, likely after going into hiding or being brought into a top-secret project in which she had to remain out of the public eye. Promptly after she mysteriously resurfaced, she was hit by a car which caused irreversible permanent brain damage.
These are just a few examples that exist relating to the subject of inventor assassinations, and the amount of people killed under similar circumstances is not only staggering but is also quite concerning. It seems very obvious that this occurs as a result of deliberate and premeditated actions and the identities of those responsible remains unknown, shrouded in a conspiratorial veil of secrecy. It is strange that more people are not aware of these correlations, and that something hasn't been done about this. Why does it continue to happen, and why is this our reality?
NATURAL CONCLUSIONS
According to the UNFCCC, the rate of global warming should be reduced to a level well below 2 °C (3.6 °F) in order to "prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system". Despite the efforts of collective agreements and intended goals however, the average surface temperature of the earth has significantly increased by about half of this threshold. The projected target of these implemented policies is to keep the rate of global warming to below 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) in comparison to pre-industrial levels, yet it is expected that by the end of the century these levels will reach over 2 °C to 4 °C. If this is the case, then we can expect to see some irreversible impacts in the future.
Understanding the reality that we are faced with, we must ask ourselves why the solutions to our problems have been opposed and suppressed so intently. With these solutions being ignored to allow for the continuation of the fossil fuel industry, it becomes obvious that there is a clear profit motive behind the agenda. We know that they are aware of the dangers associated with emissions, and the impact that it has on our environment, yet the truth shows they are not interested in the effect it has on the global community.
The globalists have known about the climate issue for quite some time now and are deliberately contributing to the problem in order to create a scapegoat. It is also being done to ensure that the resource industries can be controlled, lengthening the process for maximum financial gains. They know that nothing can be done about it because it is happening for very natural reasons, and although the human impact on the climate crisis does play a factor in things, the danger is inevitable because it's happening due to natural reasons which are beyond our control.
It is to my belief that the increased rate of global temperatures is not increasing so much due to the activities of humans but is happening more so because of the natural processes and cycles of the earth. The global warming agenda is being used as a mask to cloak the real reasons for climate change, as a way to deceive us and create and maintain revenue sources in the process. While we are seeing an increased effort put forth in order to reverse the effects of the human impact on climate change, it is still happening. Some scientists have even publicly stated that these efforts are futile, and that temperatures are expected to continually increase regardless of anything we do.
Even though some statistics have shown positive improvements in certain aspects, according to recent data taken from the Copernicus Satellite regarding the ozone layer over Antarctica, it is the smallest it has been in years. We have had the hottest summers to date in certain parts of the world, and the winter seasons are resembling the patterns of El Nino on a more consistent basis. Shifts and anomalies in weather patterns have been noticed all around the world, and the amount and severity of natural disasters seems to be increasing at an alarming rate in more recent years. Is this happening because of our influence on the environment, or could there be another reason behind it?
I believe that what we are currently experiencing is a warming period in relation to changes in the distance of our planet from the sun, as well as the recent increases in solar activities and anomalies that we have been witnessing. Every once in a while, as we orbit the sun, the earth gets closer or farther away during this cycle, leading to the cooling and heating periods we have evidenced throughout the history of our planet. The global warming period we are currently experiencing is beyond our control, and the impact mankind has on this due to gas emissions is not the prime reason for climate change. While it does play a small role in contributing to the warming, it pales in comparison to the influence of solar activity and the shift in our distance from the sun.
If we look at records relating to the geographic history of the earth, we can see that the earth has experienced several long-term shifts which have led to extended periods of global heating and cooling. According to NASA, in the past 800,000 years alone, we have been through eight ice ages which were followed by interglacial warming periods. These cycles are known as Milankovitch cycles. We also know that the earth has survived several flooding periods related to these warming periods, as many ancient cultures experienced deluges and natural disasters caused by weather anomalies. Despite these facts, NASA seems to be following the global warming agenda by claiming that the current interglacial period we are in is being caused by humans.
In the summer of 2025, I witnessed a sun rise where it seemed like the sun was so close I could have reached out and touched it on the horizon. Cars were pulling over to the side of the road because the drivers were blinded as it rose up over the horizon, and the increase of heat and solar exposure was felt immediately. I believe we will continue to see this happening, along with an increase in irregular solar activities. I believe that the real reason and truth about global warming will continue to be kept from us to avoid panic, and they will continue to blame it on human activities being the root cause of the problem.
Human beings seem to be the only species that plays with fire. If an animal were to approach a river of magma flowing from a volcano, it would steer clear of it after becoming aware of the danger of the situation. It would leave the area to avoid being harmed by it. Yet we seem to be doing the opposite. We know that some of the ways in which we currently operate as a society are harmful, yet we continue to do so with little regard as to what effect our actions will have on future generations. Mind you, much of the world is controlled by governments who dictate the way in which most of us live our lives, leaving the vast majority believing they have no say or power to function any other way as a society.
The wall that stops us from being able to make positive changes seems to get higher and higher the closer we get to the source of the problem, which is essentially the gatekeepers who maintain the status quo of this system of control. Activists know this all too well, and often times no matter how much we protest or attempt to voice our opinions on these matters, it has little to no affect on bringing about the positive solutions we seek. As the saying goes, knowing is half the battle, and the other half certainly feels like an ongoing uphill struggle. Without these efforts however, we would never progress and the times they have made an impact have been worth all the blood, sweat and tears that it took to get there.
SOURCES
Document: IPCC AR5 WG1 Summary for Policymakers 2013, p. 4: - https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf
Document: IPCC SR15 Ch1 2018, p. 54: (Steffen et al., 2016; Waters et al., 2016) - https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/SR15_Chapter1_High_Res.pdf
Website: https://corporateknights.com
Interview: Yale 360 - https://web.archive.org/web/20100612181943/
Website: https://haarp.gi.alaska.edu
Book: Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology – Dr. Nick Begich
Podcast/Webisode: The Why Files: Killer Patents & Secret Science Volume 1 – Free Energy & Anti-Gravity Cover-Ups
Comments